الخوارج والحقيقة الغائبة للسابعي - موافق للمطبوع

- The conclusion covered the results of the study as follows:

1. Among Al-Nahrawan people or the opponents of arbitration، there are escorts of the prophet، the sources agree on three of them: Zaid bin Hisn Al-Ta’i، Harqous bin Zuhair Al-Sa’di and he is other than thil Khuwaiserah، al-Mukhaddaj and al-Kherreet bin Rashed al-Sami al-Naji.

2. What is correct about arbitration case with his opponents، and what has been attributed to ibn Abbas that he is their opponent at Haraura’، is not established.

3. Al-Nahrawan people did not agree on killing Abdullah bin Khabbab، but he was killed by one of those who joined them later، Mas’ar bin Fadki Al-Tamimi، and Al-Nahrawan people exiled him.

4. Attributance of penance to Al-Nahrawan people is not proven، and if established، then it is meant disobedience as it was mentioned in Quran and the Prophetic Sunnah، and the reason for the second orientation is that giving the judgement of penance on opponents was used during Azareqa era، 64 Hijri.

5. The term “Khawarej” Kharijites came after Azareqa during 64 Hijri، and arouse during 72 Hijri.

6. The terminological meaning of Khawarej is limited for those who judge their opponents with polytheism or penance that expels out of the mellat which consequently led to the permission of killing; which means killing the opponents and dealing with them as polytheists.

7. Mohakkema conclude the following opinions:

a. Denial of arbitration.

b. Permission to give imamate (leadership) to other than Quraishians.

c. Permission to go against the unjust scholars.

d. Judge those who go against ummah (people) as infidels، but as infidels of the grace of God till 64 Hijri، but later only Ibadieh committed with that.

8. Killing of Imam Ali by Abdul Rahman bin Muljem was not set by Mohakkema.