رسالة د. كهلان الخروصي
الجزء ١ · صفحة ٩97/i-103/ii)، Kit~b al-far~|i‡ (ff.103/ii-107/i)، Kit~b m~ yalzamu min ‡am~n al-ab li-ban~tih up to f.113/ with Kit~b al-wa‰~y~ and Ris~lat al-shaykh Ab‚ `Ubayda f‚-l-zak~h ff.114/ii –116/ii are all of Mudawwanat Ab‚ Gh~nim، but this is not certain. After all these parts and sections come different parts that are not consistent with the previous parts in their style; like Kit~b kaff~r~t al-aym~n f.116/i، Kit~b al-wad~|i` wa-l-`~riy~t، Kit~b al-qismah، and they end with Kit~b al-ˆay‡ f.161/I-163/ii. At the end of each part the manuscript says that what has been mentioned in each part is “of the opinion of the Kufans shown to Ib~‡‚ scholars min qawli ahli al-Kƒfa ma`rƒ‡ayni ‰aˆ‚ˆayni `al~ al-Ib~‡iyya”.(1) This might be the reason for which Ennami gives the whole manuscript the name of “al-D‚w~n al-Ma`rƒ‡ `al~ `ulam~| al-Ib~‡iyya”.(2)
(2) 19 E، ff. 69/ii، 122/ii، 161/ii.
Ennami، Studies in Ib~‡ism (1971) pp.154، 159-64.